JUL 30TH SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST 2017 ADE
Shlemuxutuns Tthu Stii'elh Those Who Guard The Monarch
Dear
Chief Myeengun Henry & Council
Treaty : UNDERSTANDING THE CANOE & SHIP RELATIONSHIP : Title
In The Matter Of Land Title Right : Paramount Governing Authority : Indigenous Peoples Crown Land
THE PRAYER - THE INTRODUCTION - THE OBSERVATIONS
Rights Of The Child
DID THE LONG WOODS TREATY
ESTABLISH THE BRITISH MONARCH & PARLIAMENT AS ENTRENCHED TAXPAYERS TO THE CHIPPEWAS NATION ?
THE FINAL 1TH HOUR
13 INDIGENOUS GRANDMOTHERS : VIDEO
POLITICAL COMMENTARIES PUBLISHED BY
Shqwi'qwal RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN Yuxwuletun
CV2016 & ADDRESS
1.250.709.1809
Dear
Chief Myeengun Henry & Council
Treaty : UNDERSTANDING THE CANOE & SHIP RELATIONSHIP : Title
In The Matter Of Land Title Right : Paramount Governing Authority : Indigenous Peoples Crown Land
THE PRAYER - THE INTRODUCTION - THE OBSERVATIONS
Rights Of The Child
DID THE LONG WOODS TREATY
ESTABLISH THE BRITISH MONARCH & PARLIAMENT AS ENTRENCHED TAXPAYERS TO THE CHIPPEWAS NATION ?
Please, accept the following friendly questions as related to the issue of who possesses ultimate governing authority over your customary and traditional lands as they would have existed prior to creating the contract or treaty with foreign parties or actors : namely : Within your said territories (circa 580,000 acres) that are named in the Long Woods 1822 Treaty :
ABSOLUTE MONARCH Vs THE CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH REGARDING ALLODIAL TITLE (FORMS)
- How was the specific acreage understood to be possessed and governed ?
- Was the total acreage a single title held by your recognized government collective [Tummago, Metwichewin, Sagawsouai, Maquamiss, Tecumagawsi, Pemekunawassigai, Quekijick, Pawbetang, Wawiattin, Pemuseh, Sagetch, and Canotung] ?; or,
- Was the acreage of each member nation state held as a separate title block of each of the 12 member nations of Chippewas Peoples ? and,
- Within each member nation state were there individual acreage titles recognized to be held by individuals or individual families ?
- If individual members held title this would become known as "allodial title" - where each individual is recognized as an "absolute monarch" of their land - which is a nation state; and, which title could only be vacated by free choice; not lost through war or criminal act
- In the concept of the "absolute monarch", this individual may enter into a treaty or contract with other similar "allodial title" holders as "founding members" to establish a confederation or assembly
- Hence, when there commenced the discussions regarding the "indenture" of the 580,000 acres, the first question arises : Who are the Parties to this "indenture" ? Specifically, who possesses legal capacity to negotiate the land title ownership ?
- Additionally, the Long Woods 1822 Treaty refers to the English monarchs George III and IV (who are "constitutional" monarchs; requiring parliamentary assent for) ... Just as Charles II required parliamentary assent to issue the Hudson's Bay Company Charter of 1670 - and, which never did achieve the required assent; and, became null and void in 1697 (please, see these HBC Charter oversight selections)... Thus, was there evident parliamentary assent of the Long Woods Indenture (which, by English terminology relates, applies to military agreements); and, were the signatures and seals of George III and IV attached to the Long Woods 1820 and 1822 Treaties ?
- Now, back to Chippewas Nation Peoples, did the Clan Mothers approve of the Long Woods 1822 Treaty ?
- Regarding the principles of the (A) the capacity of the parties to enter into the Indenture; (B) the "meeting of minds" - the clear understanding of the Terms and Conditions of the Indenture; and, (C) the exchange of consideration (here, there are several problematic issues (i) the fixed payment period; (ii) the parties entitled to payment); and (iii) the dispute resolution process in event of failure to complete the exchange of consideration - further, since no statement is included into the Indenture regarding the governing jurisdiction of law, it would be reasonably argued that the Indenture is created through the customary and traditional laws of the confederation or assembly of Chippewas Nation Peoples
- Taxation Rights & Duties of the Nation State : The issue of Chippewas Nation Peoples's taxation process will be discussed in the next Integrity Oversight submission; including, the matter of citizenship within your territories; namely, that there is an outstanding question of retained Chippewas Nation "Crown" entitlement arising from treaties / contracts, "indentures", et cetera that are focused upon land sales. In the concept of ship named EIIR Canada, all lands are retained forever by that "Crown". It is on these matters that in 2013 Kwa'mutsun Nation State has launched the credentials challenge at the United Nations; claiming that "Canada" is not entitled to nation status (note: Northern Gateway Challenge); and, only has attained such status through a fraudulent conspiracy with the British Commonwealth, England, United Kingdom - i.e., the English Crown and its parliament : such evidence arising in 1923 when Haudenosaunee Chief Deskaheh was denied speaking rights at the League of Nations in Switzerland; where all members had agreed; but were swayed by the British and "Canadian" delegations to deny Levi General (Chief Deskaheh) recognition. Finally, on this point, since 1613 the Empire of the Netherlands and the Haudenosaunee have settled mutual recognition in the Two Row Wampum trade agreement which still stands today; and, was celebrated in its 400th year anniversary in New York - including, by the United Nations.
- Free will is paramount for any binding contract or indenture / treaty. It does not appear that the proposed Long Wood Treaty was translated into text or oral languages of the 12 member states of the Chippewas Nation ... Today, even Canadian courts are adapting interpretations regarding the international doctrine (accepted by EIIR Canada) of FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT (i.e., Tsilhqot'in Vs British Columbia)
- There is history of the 15th century Catholic Papal Bulls Inter Caetera and Romanus Pontifex which were adopted by English law in the Supremacy Acts; namely, that the Turtle Islands were considered not to be inhabited by Peoples with competent legal capacity (terra nullius) to enter into agreements ... EIIR Canada regards all indigenous Peoples as permanent wards of the state ... nation-to-nation relations as embraced by Two Row Wampum Covenant Chain is not evident anymore ...
- Have the Chippewas nation Peoples - as CSSP - considered the international venues for redemption : UN ICJ and / or Security Council; European Union Human Rights Court; Inter American Commission on Human Rights; International Indigenous Peoples Court ... ?
*** REFERENCES ***
ETC 2 3 4 5 as related to the void Hudson's Bay Company Charter Fitzgerald Examinations / Examine : 1613 : Plantagon : BC
[Bagehot : "To early royalty, as Homer describes it in Greece and as we may well imagine it elsewhere, there were always two adjuncts: one the "old men," the men of weight, the council, the boulé, of which the king asked advice, from the debates in which the king tried to learn what he could do and what he ought to do. Besides this there was the agorá, the purely listening assembly, as some have called it, but the TENTATIVE assembly, as I think it might best be called. The king came down to his assembled people in form to announce his will, but in reality, speaking in very modern words, to "feel his way". He was sacred, no doubt; and popular, very likely; still he was half like a popular Premier speaking to a high-spirited chamber; there were limits to his authority and power—limits which he would discover by trying whether eager cheers received his mandate, or only hollow murmurs and a thinking silence."]
"Tax" is defined(wkp) internationally as being : " A tax (from the Latin taxo; "rate") is a financial charge or other levy imposed upon a taxpayer (an individual or legal entity) by a state or the functional equivalent of a state such that failure to pay is punishable by law. Taxes are also imposed by manyadministrative divisions. Taxes consist of direct or indirect taxes and may be paid in money or as its labour equivalent. According to Black's Law Dictionary, a tax is a "pecuniary burden laid upon individuals or property owners to support the government [...] a payment exacted by legislative authority." It "is not a voluntary payment or donation, but an enforced contribution, exacted pursuant to legislative authority" and is "any contribution imposed by government [...] whether under the name of toll, tribute, tallage, gabel, impost, duty, custom, excise, subsidy, aid, supply, or other name."[1]"
The earliest record of taxation is noted in historical documents as being circa 6000 years ago : " in the form of clay tablets found in the ancient city-state of Lagash in modern day Iraq, just northwest of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers."
13 INDIGENOUS GRANDMOTHERS : VIDEO
Shqwi'qwal RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN Yuxwuletun
1.250.709.1809
CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY : BAGEHOT LECTURES : ENGLAND
